AP
Agent Provider Depot
Opinionated picks for agents
OpenAPI
← Compare hub

Daytona vs Fly Machines

Agent-native side-by-side. Scores are curated estimates on a 0–10 scale. Lock-in: higher = worse. Prefer JTBD picks via /api/decide when choosing for a job.

DimensionDaytonaFly Machines
Overall8.28.2
Capability fit8.88.5
Price / performance8.28.5
Latency / reliability8.28.2
Developer & agent DX8.88.0
Privacy / data retention8.07.8
Lock-in risk (higher = worse)3.03.0
Maturity / track record7.28.5
PricingAs of 2026-09-14 (daytona.io/pricing live): PAYG per-second — vCPU **$0.0504/h**, Memory **$0.0162/GiB-h**, Storage **$0.000108/GiB-h** (first 5 GiB free). $200 free compute signup. Windows $0.0858/vCPU-h. GPU preemptibl…API-driven Firecracker VMs on Fly; pay while running; great for custom sandboxes.
TaglineChoose when agents need sticky filesystems and full dev environments. E2B for disposable code exec. Confirm…DIY sandbox substrate with global edge. Prefer E2B unless you need custom machine control.

Daytona

Choose when agents need sticky filesystems and full dev environments. E2B for disposable code exec. Confirm licensing after 2026 closed-source shift. Strengths: Persistent coding environments for agents; OSS + cloud; Fast workspace spin-up.

Strengths

  • Persistent coding environments for agents
  • OSS + cloud
  • Fast workspace spin-up

Weaknesses

  • Container isolation ≠ Firecracker
  • Positioning overlaps E2B/Modal
  • Ecosystem still scaling
GET /api/providers/daytona

Fly Machines

DIY sandbox substrate with global edge. Prefer E2B unless you need custom machine control. Strengths: Programmable VMs globally; Firecracker isolation; Integrate with Fly networking.

Strengths

  • Programmable VMs globally
  • Firecracker isolation
  • Integrate with Fly networking

Weaknesses

  • You build more sandbox UX yourself
  • Not agent-specialized like E2B
  • Ops knowledge required
GET /api/providers/fly-machines

More pairs: anthropic-vs-openai · openai-vs-google-ai · groq-vs-fireworks · fireworks-vs-together · qdrant-vs-pinecone · pinecone-vs-supabase-pgvector · e2b-vs-modal · browserbase-vs-firecrawl