← Compare hub
Qdrant vs Weaviate
Agent-native side-by-side. Scores are curated estimates on a 0–10 scale. Lock-in: higher = worse. Prefer JTBD picks via /api/decide when choosing for a job.
| Dimension | Qdrant | Weaviate |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Capability fit | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Price / performance | 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Latency / reliability | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Developer & agent DX | 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Privacy / data retention | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Lock-in risk (higher = worse) | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Maturity / track record | 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Pricing | Rust engine; open-source + Qdrant Cloud; excellent filtered ANN; competitive cloud pricing. | Open-source + Weaviate Cloud; modular vectorizers; hybrid search; usage/cluster pricing on cloud. |
| Tagline | Depot pick for serious vector workloads with filters. Self-host or Cloud — either way you can leave. | Best when hybrid search and modularity matter. Cloud for convenience; self-host when lock-in anxiety spikes. |
Qdrant
Depot pick for serious vector workloads with filters. Self-host or Cloud — either way you can leave. Strengths: Top filtered-search performance; Great self-host story; Cloud option without giving up OSS.
Strengths
- Top filtered-search performance
- Great self-host story
- Cloud option without giving up OSS
Weaknesses
- Ecosystem slightly smaller than Pinecone mindshare
- Need to tune HNSW for best results
- UI/ops polish varying by tier
Weaviate
Best when hybrid search and modularity matter. Cloud for convenience; self-host when lock-in anxiety spikes. Strengths: Hybrid search + modules; Open-source escape hatch; Strong RAG feature set.
Strengths
- Hybrid search + modules
- Open-source escape hatch
- Strong RAG feature set
Weaknesses
- Ops complexity self-hosted
- Cloud pricing needs care
- Performance tuning required at scale
More pairs: anthropic-vs-openai · openai-vs-google-ai · groq-vs-fireworks · fireworks-vs-together · qdrant-vs-pinecone · pinecone-vs-supabase-pgvector · e2b-vs-modal · browserbase-vs-firecrawl