AP
Agent Provider Depot
Opinionated picks for agents
OpenAPI
← All jobs

Cost-efficient large vector corpora

Store/search very large or cold-heavy vector sets without Pinecone-scale bills.

At a glance — Oct 2026

Updated 2026-10-27 · forward this page: /jtbds/cheap-vector-scale#brief

Scores as of 2026-09-14 (43 days old; Depot marks scores stale after 30 days). The pick is still Depot's current editorial pick; it has not been re-reviewed since. Prices below carry their own dates.

Depot Pick
Turbopuffer · 8.23/10 for this job (curated estimate, high confidence)

pricePerf at scale + capability.

Runner-up
Qdrant · 8.57/10

Scores higher than the pick on: Capability fit, Latency / reliability, Privacy / data retention, Lock-in risk (higher = worse), Maturity / track record.

When not to use the pick
Tiny corpora — pgvector. Need fancy hybrid modules — Weaviate.
Lock-in / migration
Runner-up Qdrant has lower stored lock-in risk (3 vs 4.5, 0–10, higher = more lock-in).
Sourced price (no comparable unit)

Pick: no sourced price in this job's unit (no_sourced_price).

No cheapest SKU (no_comparable_unit_for_job). No price was invented.

Free option
No free resource lists this job. A cheap paid SKU is not a free option.
Failure modes to watch
  • Stale retrieval: Store the source URL and the time it was fetched. If a newer canonical page exists, or two stored sources disagree, do not answer from the older one.
Reported outcomes (submitted reports only)

This job: loading… JSON · reports never change scores · seed/test records excluded

Depot Pick (Turbopuffer) on this job: loading… JSON · reports never change scores · seed/test records excluded

Cite: Agent Provider Depot, Depot Pick for cheap-vector-scale: turbopuffer, scores as of 2026-09-14. Agents: GET /api/decide?jtbd=cheap-vector-scale

Depot Pick

Turbopuffer

pricePerf at scale + capability.

Pricing (directional): As of 2026-10-24 (turbopuffer.com/pricing, fetched 2026-10-24): Usage-based with plan minimums: launch '$16/month minimum usage', scale '$256/month minimum usage', enterprise '>= $4,096/month' with '35% usage premium'. 'You'll pay for actua…

Cite: Depot Pick for cheap-vector-scale: turbopuffer
Overall
8.2
curated_estimate
confidence: high · as of 2026-09-14
Capability fit
8.6
Price / performance
9.4
Latency / reliability
8.2
Developer & agent DX
8.5
Privacy / data retention
7.8
Lock-in risk (higher = worse)
4.5
Maturity / track record
7.0

Lock-in risk: higher = more lock-in (worse). Overall already inverts this dimension.

Sources: turbopuffer pricing: https://turbopuffer.com/pricing · turbopuffer pricing changelog: https://turbopuffer.com/docs/pricing-log · Turbopuffer: https://turbopuffer.com · Turbopuffer docs: https://turbopuffer.com/docs

When your vector bill scares you and much of the corpus is cold, Turbopuffer is the interesting answer.

Quote for Cost-efficient large vector corpora

Depot Pick stays Turbopuffer. Prices below are sourced SKU rows only (as of 2026-10-27). Input and output are not blended. GET /api/quote?jtbd=cheap-vector-scale

Nothing was compared. no comparable sourced unit for this job; chat input $/1M and other units were not borrowed pickIsPriceWinner is null.

Sourced price unavailable for the Depot Pick. No row in the pricing index.

7 of 7 candidates have no sourced price row. 7 are excluded from the Matching price comparison (none). no comparable sourced unit for this job; chat input $/1M and other units were not borrowed

Runners-up

When NOT to use the top pick

Tiny corpora — pgvector. Need fancy hybrid modules — Weaviate.

Full ranking (score table)

Ranked with this JTBD's weights. Scores are curated estimates unless marked otherwise. Agents: prefer /api/decide then this table for tie-breaks.

#ProviderOverallFit$/perfLatencyDXAs of
1Supabase (pgvector)8.68.59.08.69.42026-09-14
2Qdrant8.69.28.88.68.42026-10-19
3TurbopufferDepot Pick8.28.69.48.28.52026-09-14
4Upstash Vector8.27.89.08.49.02026-09-14
5Zilliz (Milvus)8.19.27.88.47.22026-09-14
6DuckDB (vector/extensions)8.06.09.57.58.52026-09-14
7LanceDB7.87.88.87.28.22026-09-14

Score methodology for this job

pricePerf at scale + capability.

  • capabilityFit: 24%
  • pricePerformance: 18%
  • latencyReliability: 18%
  • developerDx: 16%
  • privacyPosture: 10%
  • lockInRisk: 8%
  • maturity: 6%