AP
Agent Provider Depot
Opinionated picks for agents
OpenAPI
← All jobs

Prompt-injection / jailbreak firewall

Screen untrusted user and retrieved content for instruction-override before it reaches the model — a dedicated firewall, not a content taxonomy.

At a glance — Oct 2026

Updated 2026-10-27 · forward this page: /jtbds/prompt-injection-firewall#brief

Scores as of 2026-09-14 (43 days old; Depot marks scores stale after 30 days). The pick is still Depot's current editorial pick; it has not been re-reviewed since. Prices below carry their own dates.

Depot Pick
Lakera Guard · 8.21/10 for this job (curated estimate, high confidence)

capability on injection/jailbreak detection + dx of a single API. Distinct from content-moderation (taxonomy) and llm-input-guardrails (programmable policy engine).

Runner-up
NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails · 7.87/10

Scores higher than the pick on: Lock-in risk (higher = worse).

When not to use the pick
Need programmable multi-step rails / topical policies — NeMo Guardrails; only need free hate/sexual/violence flags — OpenAI Moderation; already standardized on Palo Alto — Prisma AIRS; Cisco estate — cisco-ai-defense.
Lock-in / migration
Runner-up NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails has lower stored lock-in risk (4.5 vs 5.5, 0–10, higher = more lock-in). Self-host fallback listed for this job: LLM Guard.
Sourced price (no comparable unit)

Pick: no sourced price in this job's unit (no_sourced_price).

No cheapest SKU (no_comparable_unit_for_job). No price was invented.

Free option
  • LLM Guard (oss) — source, as of 2026-10-25
Failure modes to watch
  • Runaway spend: Set a budget and a tool-call cap per task. Alert when spend jumps. Stop the run at the cap instead of summarizing a partial trace as success.
  • Eval contamination: Keep gold labels out of the agent prompt. Store the harness version beside the score. Do not compare a number across a benchmark revision without saying the revision changed.
  • Over-refusal: Log refusals separately from successes. Review a sample against the written policy. Do not treat a refusal as a pass, and do not weaken a safety check to raise the pass rate.
  • Prompt injection: Compare each tool call to the original user task. If the call only makes sense given text that arrived from a fetched page, file, or message, stop and ask. Record which source the instruction came from. This catalog does not store payloads or attack steps.
  • Weak verification: Success requires an end-state check the agent does not grade for itself: tests, a database diff, or a separate judge that cannot see the gold label.
Reported outcomes (submitted reports only)

This job: loading… JSON · reports never change scores · seed/test records excluded

Depot Pick (Lakera Guard) on this job: loading… JSON · reports never change scores · seed/test records excluded

Cite: Agent Provider Depot, Depot Pick for prompt-injection-firewall: lakera, scores as of 2026-09-14. Agents: GET /api/decide?jtbd=prompt-injection-firewall

Free Prompt-injection / jailbreak firewall options · for security-review agents

Depot Pick

Lakera Guard

capability on injection/jailbreak detection + dx of a single API. Distinct from content-moderation (taxonomy) and llm-input-guardrails (programmable policy engine).

Pricing (directional): As of 2026-09-14 (platform.lakera.ai/pricing): Community $0 — 10k requests/mo, 8k-token prompt cap, SaaS EU residency, SOC2/GDPR. Enterprise sales-gated — flexible volume, configurable prompt size, SaaS or self-host, SSO/RBAC/SIEM, EU/US re…

Cite: Depot Pick for prompt-injection-firewall: lakera
Overall
8.2
curated_estimate
confidence: high · as of 2026-09-14
Capability fit
8.8
Price / performance
7.8
Latency / reliability
8.4
Developer & agent DX
9.0
Privacy / data retention
8.8
Lock-in risk (higher = worse)
5.5
Maturity / track record
8.0

Lock-in risk: higher = more lock-in (worse). Overall already inverts this dimension.

Sources: Lakera Guard pricing: https://platform.lakera.ai/pricing · Lakera: https://www.lakera.ai · Prompt injection (Lakera): https://www.lakera.ai/risk/prompt-injection-attacks

Depot pick for a dedicated prompt-injection firewall in front of any LLM. NeMo when you need programmable rails; OpenAI Moderation for free taxonomy flags. Check Point acquisition is real — product still has a public API.

Quote for Prompt-injection / jailbreak firewall

Depot Pick stays Lakera Guard. Prices below are sourced SKU rows only (as of 2026-10-27). Input and output are not blended. GET /api/quote?jtbd=prompt-injection-firewall

Nothing was compared. guardrail/firewall/gateway job: priced per request, plan or contract, not per chat token; chat input $/1M is not borrowed and no comparable sourced per-request unit is stored pickIsPriceWinner is null.

Sourced price unavailable for the Depot Pick. No row in the pricing index.

7 of 9 candidates have no sourced price row. 9 are excluded from the Matching price comparison (none). guardrail/firewall/gateway job: priced per request, plan or contract, not per chat token; chat input $/1M is not borrowed and no comparable sourced per-request unit is stored

Runners-up

When NOT to use the top pick

Need programmable multi-step rails / topical policies — NeMo Guardrails; only need free hate/sexual/violence flags — OpenAI Moderation; already standardized on Palo Alto — Prisma AIRS; Cisco estate — cisco-ai-defense.

Full ranking (score table)

Ranked with this JTBD's weights. Scores are curated estimates unless marked otherwise. Agents: prefer /api/decide then this table for tie-breaks.

#ProviderOverallFit$/perfLatencyDXAs of
1OpenAI Moderation8.68.29.89.29.42026-09-14
2Lakera GuardDepot Pick8.28.87.88.49.02026-09-14
3Guardrails AI8.28.48.87.88.22026-09-14
4Groq8.07.89.08.28.82026-09-14
5NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails7.98.87.58.07.02026-09-14
6Patronus AI7.38.45.58.07.22026-09-14
7Palo Alto Prisma AIRS (ex-Protect AI)7.38.65.08.86.22026-09-14
8Cisco AI Defense (ex-Robust Intelligence)7.18.44.88.66.02026-09-14
9HiddenLayer6.98.44.08.26.02026-09-14

Score methodology for this job

capability on injection/jailbreak detection + dx of a single API. Distinct from content-moderation (taxonomy) and llm-input-guardrails (programmable policy engine).

  • capabilityFit: 25%
  • pricePerformance: 18%
  • latencyReliability: 15%
  • developerDx: 15%
  • privacyPosture: 10%
  • lockInRisk: 7%
  • maturity: 10%