Prompt-injection / jailbreak firewall
Screen untrusted user and retrieved content for instruction-override before it reaches the model — a dedicated firewall, not a content taxonomy.
At a glance — Oct 2026
Updated 2026-10-27 · forward this page: /jtbds/prompt-injection-firewall#briefScores as of 2026-09-14 (43 days old; Depot marks scores stale after 30 days). The pick is still Depot's current editorial pick; it has not been re-reviewed since. Prices below carry their own dates.
- Depot Pick
- Lakera Guard · 8.21/10 for this job (curated estimate, high confidence)
capability on injection/jailbreak detection + dx of a single API. Distinct from content-moderation (taxonomy) and llm-input-guardrails (programmable policy engine).
- Runner-up
- NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails · 7.87/10
Scores higher than the pick on: Lock-in risk (higher = worse).
- When not to use the pick
- Need programmable multi-step rails / topical policies — NeMo Guardrails; only need free hate/sexual/violence flags — OpenAI Moderation; already standardized on Palo Alto — Prisma AIRS; Cisco estate — cisco-ai-defense.
- Lock-in / migration
- Runner-up NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails has lower stored lock-in risk (4.5 vs 5.5, 0–10, higher = more lock-in). Self-host fallback listed for this job: LLM Guard.
- Sourced price (no comparable unit)
Pick: no sourced price in this job's unit (no_sourced_price).
No cheapest SKU (no_comparable_unit_for_job). No price was invented.
- Free option
- LLM Guard (oss) — source, as of 2026-10-25
- Failure modes to watch
- Runaway spend: Set a budget and a tool-call cap per task. Alert when spend jumps. Stop the run at the cap instead of summarizing a partial trace as success.
- Eval contamination: Keep gold labels out of the agent prompt. Store the harness version beside the score. Do not compare a number across a benchmark revision without saying the revision changed.
- Over-refusal: Log refusals separately from successes. Review a sample against the written policy. Do not treat a refusal as a pass, and do not weaken a safety check to raise the pass rate.
- Prompt injection: Compare each tool call to the original user task. If the call only makes sense given text that arrived from a fetched page, file, or message, stop and ask. Record which source the instruction came from. This catalog does not store payloads or attack steps.
- Weak verification: Success requires an end-state check the agent does not grade for itself: tests, a database diff, or a separate judge that cannot see the gold label.
Cite: Agent Provider Depot, Depot Pick for prompt-injection-firewall: lakera, scores as of 2026-09-14. Agents: GET /api/decide?jtbd=prompt-injection-firewall
Free Prompt-injection / jailbreak firewall options · for security-review agents
Lakera Guard
capability on injection/jailbreak detection + dx of a single API. Distinct from content-moderation (taxonomy) and llm-input-guardrails (programmable policy engine).
Pricing (directional): As of 2026-09-14 (platform.lakera.ai/pricing): Community $0 — 10k requests/mo, 8k-token prompt cap, SaaS EU residency, SOC2/GDPR. Enterprise sales-gated — flexible volume, configurable prompt size, SaaS or self-host, SSO/RBAC/SIEM, EU/US re…
Lock-in risk: higher = more lock-in (worse). Overall already inverts this dimension.
Depot pick for a dedicated prompt-injection firewall in front of any LLM. NeMo when you need programmable rails; OpenAI Moderation for free taxonomy flags. Check Point acquisition is real — product still has a public API.
Quote for Prompt-injection / jailbreak firewall
Depot Pick stays Lakera Guard. Prices below are sourced SKU rows only (as of 2026-10-27). Input and output are not blended. GET /api/quote?jtbd=prompt-injection-firewall
Nothing was compared. guardrail/firewall/gateway job: priced per request, plan or contract, not per chat token; chat input $/1M is not borrowed and no comparable sourced per-request unit is stored pickIsPriceWinner is null.
Sourced price unavailable for the Depot Pick. No row in the pricing index.
7 of 9 candidates have no sourced price row. 9 are excluded from the Matching price comparison (none). guardrail/firewall/gateway job: priced per request, plan or contract, not per chat token; chat input $/1M is not borrowed and no comparable sourced per-request unit is stored
Runners-up
NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails
When OpenAI Moderation taxonomy is not enough and you need programmable rails. Host Llama Guard on Groq for…
OpenAI Moderation
Default first-pass content filter for agent I/O. Pair with Llama Guard (Groq) or NeMo Guardrails when you…
Palo Alto Prisma AIRS (ex-Protect AI)
Catalog the current SKU (Prisma AIRS), not the dead Protect AI brand. Pick only if PANW is already the…
Guardrails AI
OSS programmable rails peer to NeMo Guardrails. Lakera when you want a hosted injection firewall API…
HiddenLayer
Enterprise AI security peer to Prisma AIRS / Cisco AI Defense. Lakera/NeMo/Guardrails for builders…
When NOT to use the top pick
Need programmable multi-step rails / topical policies — NeMo Guardrails; only need free hate/sexual/violence flags — OpenAI Moderation; already standardized on Palo Alto — Prisma AIRS; Cisco estate — cisco-ai-defense.
Full ranking (score table)
Ranked with this JTBD's weights. Scores are curated estimates unless marked otherwise. Agents: prefer /api/decide then this table for tie-breaks.
| # | Provider | Overall | Fit | $/perf | Latency | DX | As of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI Moderation | 8.6 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 2026-09-14 |
| 2 | Lakera GuardDepot Pick | 8.2 | 8.8 | 7.8 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 2026-09-14 |
| 3 | Guardrails AI | 8.2 | 8.4 | 8.8 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 2026-09-14 |
| 4 | Groq | 8.0 | 7.8 | 9.0 | 8.2 | 8.8 | 2026-09-14 |
| 5 | NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails | 7.9 | 8.8 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 2026-09-14 |
| 6 | Patronus AI | 7.3 | 8.4 | 5.5 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 2026-09-14 |
| 7 | Palo Alto Prisma AIRS (ex-Protect AI) | 7.3 | 8.6 | 5.0 | 8.8 | 6.2 | 2026-09-14 |
| 8 | Cisco AI Defense (ex-Robust Intelligence) | 7.1 | 8.4 | 4.8 | 8.6 | 6.0 | 2026-09-14 |
| 9 | HiddenLayer | 6.9 | 8.4 | 4.0 | 8.2 | 6.0 | 2026-09-14 |
Score methodology for this job
capability on injection/jailbreak detection + dx of a single API. Distinct from content-moderation (taxonomy) and llm-input-guardrails (programmable policy engine).
capabilityFit: 25%pricePerformance: 18%latencyReliability: 15%developerDx: 15%privacyPosture: 10%lockInRisk: 7%maturity: 10%