AP
Agent Provider Depot
Opinionated picks for agents
OpenAPI
← All jobs

RAG-specific evaluation metrics

Measure faithfulness, context precision/recall for retrieval pipelines.

At a glance — Oct 2026

Updated 2026-10-27 · forward this page: /jtbds/rag-evals#brief

Scores as of 2026-09-14 (43 days old; Depot marks scores stale after 30 days). The pick is still Depot's current editorial pick; it has not been re-reviewed since. Prices below carry their own dates.

Depot Pick
Ragas · 8.29/10 for this job (curated estimate, high confidence)

Capability fit for RAG metrics.

Runner-up
Promptfoo · 8.43/10

Scores higher than the pick on: Capability fit, Latency / reliability, Developer & agent DX, Maturity / track record.

When not to use the pick
General agent/tool evals — Promptfoo/Braintrust.
Lock-in / migration
The pick has lower stored lock-in risk than runner-up Promptfoo (2 vs 2.5). Pick exit signals: open source (provider tag `oss`). Self-host fallback listed for this job: Ragas.
Sourced price (no comparable unit)

Pick: no sourced price in this job's unit (no_sourced_price).

No cheapest SKU (no_comparable_unit_for_job). No price was invented.

Free option
  • Ragas (oss) — source, as of 2026-10-25
Failure modes to watch
  • Eval contamination: Keep gold labels out of the agent prompt. Store the harness version beside the score. Do not compare a number across a benchmark revision without saying the revision changed.
  • Benchmark protocol mismatch: Store assisted-or-not, subset, and harness version beside every cited score. Refuse a ranking that mixes those fields.
  • Context overflow: If the input exceeds the window, say so and retrieve a narrower slice. Do not answer from a truncated head as if it were the whole source.
  • Inter-agent misalignment: Log the assigned subtask next to the worker's stated result. The lead rejects a result that does not match the assignment.
  • Lost in the middle: Ask the agent to name the passage it used. Spot-check questions whose only support sits in the middle of the context, not only at the edges.
  • Non-determinism: Run the task more than once and compare the end state, not a single transcript. Record the trial count next to any success rate you cite.
Reported outcomes (submitted reports only)

This job: loading… JSON · reports never change scores · seed/test records excluded

Depot Pick (Ragas) on this job: loading… JSON · reports never change scores · seed/test records excluded

Cite: Agent Provider Depot, Depot Pick for rag-evals: ragas, scores as of 2026-09-14. Agents: GET /api/decide?jtbd=rag-evals

Free RAG-specific evaluation metrics options · for rag agents · for eval-judge agents

Depot Pick

Ragas

Capability fit for RAG metrics.

Pricing (directional): As of 2026-09-14: Free open-source RAG evaluation library; cost is judge-LLM tokens only (~$0.50–$2 per 100 queries with cheap judges). No hosted SaaS required. Deep LangChain/LlamaIndex integration.

Cite: Depot Pick for rag-evals: ragas
Overall
8.3
curated_estimate
confidence: high · as of 2026-09-14
Capability fit
8.0
Price / performance
9.5
Latency / reliability
7.5
Developer & agent DX
8.2
Privacy / data retention
9.2
Lock-in risk (higher = worse)
2.0
Maturity / track record
7.8

Lock-in risk: higher = more lock-in (worse). Overall already inverts this dimension.

Sources: Ragas docs: https://docs.ragas.io · Ragas GitHub: https://github.com/explodinggradients/ragas · Best LLM eval tools 2026: https://deploybase.ai/articles/best-llm-evaluation-tools

Default RAG metric library. Pair with Promptfoo/Braintrust for broader agent evals.

Quote for RAG-specific evaluation metrics

Depot Pick stays Ragas. Prices below are sourced SKU rows only (as of 2026-10-27). Input and output are not blended. GET /api/quote?jtbd=rag-evals

Nothing was compared. no comparable sourced unit for this job; chat input $/1M and other units were not borrowed pickIsPriceWinner is null.

Sourced price unavailable for the Depot Pick. No row in the pricing index.

3 of 4 candidates have no sourced price row. 4 are excluded from the Matching price comparison (none). no comparable sourced unit for this job; chat input $/1M and other units were not borrowed

Runners-up

When NOT to use the top pick

General agent/tool evals — Promptfoo/Braintrust.

Full ranking (score table)

Ranked with this JTBD's weights. Scores are curated estimates unless marked otherwise. Agents: prefer /api/decide then this table for tie-breaks.

#ProviderOverallFit$/perfLatencyDXAs of
1Promptfoo8.48.29.27.88.82026-10-19
2RagasDepot Pick8.38.09.57.58.22026-09-14
3Braintrust8.39.27.58.68.82026-10-19
4Galileo7.58.46.28.07.82026-09-14

Score methodology for this job

Capability fit for RAG metrics.

  • capabilityFit: 26%
  • pricePerformance: 12%
  • latencyReliability: 12%
  • developerDx: 22%
  • privacyPosture: 12%
  • lockInRisk: 8%
  • maturity: 8%