Browser Use Cloud
Pick when you want an agent-native browser loop, not just a hosted Chromium. Browserbase still wins pure…
Pick when you want an agent-native browser loop, not just a hosted Chromium. Browserbase still wins pure session polish. Strengths: OSS agent loop + cloud; NL agent mode and raw CDP; Active agent-browser ecosystem.
Lock-in risk: higher = more lock-in (worse). Overall already inverts this dimension.
Pick when you want an agent-native browser loop, not just a hosted Chromium. Browserbase still wins pure session polish.
Strengths
- · OSS agent loop + cloud
- · NL agent mode and raw CDP
- · Active agent-browser ecosystem
Weaknesses
- · Autonomy increases policy risk
- · Cloud claims need workload validation
- · Younger than Browserbase
Pricing notes
As of 2026-09-14 (browser-use.com/pricing): No subscription. Browsers $0.02/hr (1-min min); residential proxy $5/GB (on by default); direct/BYO proxy $0.20/GB. Agent API = model cost + 20% service fee (or 20% of published rates if BYOK) + browser/traffic. $5 min top-up; $15 free credits once. Concurrency 10→50→250→500→1000 by lifetime spend. Hosted model examples (fee included): Claude Sonnet 5 $2.40/$12; GPT-5.6 Luna $0.24/$1.44; BU 2.0 $0.60/$3.50 per 1M. OSS library remains free to self-host.
Sourced pricing
Contract status unit_mismatch · unit_mismatch. Single normalized $/1M: null. Machine list: /api/pricing?provider=browser-use
- Browsers · usd_per_browser_hour · $0.02 · unit_mismatch · normalized null
- High-quality residential proxies · usd_per_gb · $5 · unit_mismatch · normalized null
- Direct or your own proxy · usd_per_gb · $0.2 · unit_mismatch · normalized null
Community signals
Insight claims only — never mutate official scores. Outside reports: 0; seed examples: 0.
No insights yet. Submit a production claim →
All insights for this provider →